Updated: Dec 12, 2020
What advice do we give to parents about how fast a pupil should read? What advice do we give to pupils? How does the speed of reading impact on cognition, comprehension and the transfer of what we read to long term memory? How many books should pupils read in a month? How many hours need to be devoted to reading to meet this target?
We know that the quantity of reading makes a difference to the progress pupils make in reading comprehension. Therefore, the number of books consumed by a child is important and parents and educators should do all they can to encourage pupils to read widely and often. An extensive diet of reading is important for all sorts of other reasons, such as enjoyment, escapism, social and emotional wellbeing, not to mention the benefits reading has to our knowledge base and views of the world. Pupils benefit from extensive reading. This would suggest, therefore, that being able to read quickly means that you would be at an advantage, because you can 'eat the text' at a faster rate and consume more than someone who reads slowly. This is on the whole an ever-increasing circle, the faster you read, the more you can consume, and the more you consume, the faster your pace of reading becomes.
Reading volume is defined as the combination of time students spend reading plus the number of words they actually consume as they read (Allington, 2012). This combination affects everything from students’ cognitive abilities to their vocabulary development and knowledge of the world (Cunningham & Zibulsky, 2013).
Most adults read at about 250 words per minute. If you read often, this might be 300 words per minute. Perhaps you would like to time yourself? Reading aloud is slower. This is for two reasons - it is physically difficult to read aloud at the same pace as silent reading and reading aloud usually needs to be at a pace that is comfortable for the reader. Most audio books and presenters speak at about 160 words per minute, perhaps a little slower than you might typically read aloud yourself. Children read at a slower rate, which increases throughout their time at school. By the end of Year 2 (age 7), we would expect a child's reading rate to be about 90 words per minute (below 60 would be a concern and there is some research that would suggest below 100 in Year 4 would cause pupils frustration), and around 140-160 for Year 5 and by Year 6 (age 11) 160-180. I am sure that many teachers and parents would find this information useful. For example, are parents reading aloud to their children at a pace that is too fast for comprehension? Are they expecting their child to finish reading a novel too quickly? If the adult and the child have decided to read the same novel (a copy each), the adult will need to keep in mind that they will read at a faster rate than their child and should take steps to ensure that it does not become an uneven race to finish! If you are reading a popular novel, you will probably be able to find it on Audible and it will state how long the audio version takes in hours and minutes (which, as we have stated, will typically be at 160 wpm) so from this you can extrapolate how long is should take children/adults to read a novel. If you want to finish the novel in a week, it would enable you to work out how many minutes per day would need to be devoted to reading.
Which children might need an intervention to increase word reading rate? This is particularly a question to ask from mid-way through Year 2 and upwards throughout a child's school career.
One of the benefits of high volumes of reading is the impact this has on vocabulary development. There are two components of vocabulary to consider: one is breadth of vocabulary (the number of words known); the other is depth of vocabulary (different meanings for a word that depend on the context in which the word is being used). For example: If I said to you the word 'red', you might immediately think of the colour red. However, if I said the 'boy was red faced' you might think of something other than the colour red, and if I said 'we had the red carpet treatment' you might think of something else, or if I posed a question such as 'were lady Macbeth's hands as red as those of her husbands?' you would not simply be thinking of the colour red. When children read high volumes of text they are more likely to be exposed to different ways in which a word is used. Words in context make a difference to how we interpret their meaning. Children who read widely have broader and deeper vocabularies. There is empirical evidence that, for older children and adults, much learning of new words occurs through exposure to written texts (Nagy, Herman, & Anderson, 1985; Sternberg, 1987). There are many positive studies (e.g. Cain and Oakhill, 2011; Kempe, Eriksson-Gustavsson, and Samuelsson, 2011). One of the reasons for this is that print material expose pupils to words that are less frequently used in spoken everyday language (such as abrasive, omnipresent, superfluous, stipulation), including words that are perhaps more associated with bygone eras (such as hearth, wireless and stove). Reading is one of the best ways to increase vocabulary, particularly if the reading diet includes fiction and non-fiction books. Subject knowledge is a key ingredient into acquiring vocabulary, and therefore parents and educators should encourage children to read a range of different texts, including non-fiction.
Whilst it is an American list, this document lists some of the less frequently used words with synonyms.
For those who are really keen on word frequency lists... http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/flists.html
Most EYFS and Year 1 teachers will be familiar with the 100, 300, 800 and 1000 most frequently used words.
300 most common words
1000 most common words
If most Year 6 pupils read at 140-160 words per minute (with many reading at 180+), the first column shows the number of words that are likely to be read against the number of minutes committed to reading. The second column simply adds 15 minutes of school reading a day to the total.
The table above illustrates how important home reading (or reading outside the normal classroom day) matters. The child who reads for an hour a day at home will be exposed to a wider vocabulary and in more contexts. Of course, I am not suggesting that this be forced reading time! This has to come from a place of 'desire to read'. Pupils who are motivated to read bring something extra to the reading process, e.g. concentration, perseverance, a desire to understanding the text, a willingness to engage in thinking while reading. Intrinsic motivation is therefore an important factor. Desire to read is enhanced by being fluent and having good comprehension skills (which improve the more you read). The chicken and the egg! Do pupils and parents know how much the quantity of reading adds to vocabulary development? (And other high impact strategies, such as expanding vocabulary via root words, prefixes, suffixes; etymology of words; word games; using new words, synonyms, antonyms, high-frequency words; engagement in conversations). Do they know how much reading quantity adds to comprehension skills? For younger children, vocabulary developments tends to be higher if there has been 1) repeated reading of the same book by the adult; 2) the opportunity for children to join in with the print; 3) discussion of new / interesting vocabulary after reading. There is certainly a lot of evidence that suggests analytical talk around the text is significant for pupils making progress in both word reading, vocabulary development and comprehension. Book talk engaged in by parents has been found to variable and school can support parents in getting the most out of book talk by providing advice booklets, video clips and workshops.
I wonder how many parents would think about combining fiction and non-fiction texts at home in order to support vocabulary development (and reading comprehension). For example, reading a non-fiction book about rivers would expand a child's knowledge of rivers and vocabulary associated with rivers. If the child then reads a book such as Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame, the child will find it easier to read as they will already be familiar with some of the river terms and they are more likely to be able to visualise the scenes, particularly if the adult can also provide their child with the opportunity to see a river first hand! The fiction and non-fiction vocabulary both support and compliment each other. Reading easy non-fiction books introduces children to unfamiliar terms and content that in turn makes it easier for them to digest harder books on the same topic. Sequencing of texts is therefore very beneficial to the reading and learning process. Is this knowledge something that parents could take advantage of? Could teachers put sets of non-fiction and fiction together for home learning packs? Could teachers provide a sequence of books on the same topic for home learning - starting with images (no text), basic books, more advanced texts? Could suggested title combinations be sent home? How is text combining and text sequencing being taken into account when planning lessons and designing schemes of work?
What impacts on the speed of reading?
Known vocabulary (it is faster to read words that you are familiar with).
The ability to discern different sounds in word. Pupils who have difficulty associating sounds with letters might have difficulty learning to read. It is for this reason that it takes a special set of teaching (and learning) skills for a hearing-impaired child to learn to read. Strong phonics programmes support the development of early reading.
Eye tracking, eye movements - the ability to read ahead, track the words from left to right. The speed at which the eye can move and flick between sections of text. Any impairments to sight can slow down reading speed. There may be exercises pupils need to complete to assist with eye movements - this should come under the advice of an expert in this field, e.g. the optician, eye specialist at a hospital.
Enjoyable practice has a great deal of influence on reading speed and comprehension. The more children read, usually the better their reading rates. Enjoyable practice should include both silent reading and reading aloud.
Types of practice (possible interventions are described later in this blog post) can increase rates of reading and fluency. Reading aloud to a real person (or a live animal, such as a dog - more so than reading to a puppet/toy although this is also beneficial) supports word reading rate and accuracy levels (LeRoux, Swartz, & Swart, 2014)
Those reading at very fast levels are not reading every word. They are scanning and skimming. They are reading in chunks and often visualising what they read as if it is a movie playing. Some high-speed readers are visualising words rather than reading each word.
The readers mental cognition speed impacts on reading (or should - more on this later). More complex texts usually lead readers to slow down their rate of reading in order to ensure that comprehension levels are maintained.
The size of text, layout and font styles can impact on reading speed.
Needing to user a tracer or a finger to track the text slows down reading rate. Most children will eventually acquire the skills to read without needing this approach. However, some types of finger pointing are used in speed reading. This is referred to as 'meta guiding'. There are specific programmes on speed reading, mostly aimed at adults.
Familiarity with the text type.
The ability of pupils to read with sentences in mind rather than words in mind helps to speed up reading rate. Pupils reading rate might also improve with training that focus on 'seeing' or 'reading' several words at once.
Moving from reading aloud to silent reading (as silent reading, as explained easier is faster than reading aloud).
(Note, if you wish to assess a pupils' reading rate, try to test them on more than one passage of text (usually for 1 minute of reading time). Pupils reading rate (and fluency - e.g. prosody) should be higher for texts that are at their current level of decoding. It is therefore useful to consider their reading rate for a text at their current level and texts between that and what might be expected for their year group (if there is any difference between the two). Generally, it is recommended that pupils are able to read 90% of the words for the text to be at the right level for them. Children who recognise less than 90% of the words in a text can generally not read the text productively without a lot of support (the frustration level). When conducting reading rate activities, it is also good to count errors. These are substitutions, omissions, insertions, self-corrections, and help provided by the teacher after a 5 second hesitation. It should be noted that accuracy rates naturally improve during KS1 and should be above 90%. You can therefore measure the impact of any intervention in terms of reading speed, accuracy and fluency.)
Interventions aimed at improving rates of reading, accuracy and fluency:
FOR EARLY YEARS, pupils need to hear lots of stories being read by adults. They also need the opportunity to join in familiar or repeated phrases. Younger pupils can engage in 'echo reading' where they repeat back modelled phrases and sentences as part of enjoying a whole class text. They can hear the same story multiple times. Hearing lots of different adults model reading can be an advantage. Pupils can also start to 'listen along' as they read, e.g. use of headphones and a recorded story, providing the opportunity for differentiated texts to be used - good for reading centres. If you buy multiple copies of the book and a headphone splitter, group sessions can be set up. However, high-impact strategies also include adults helping children learn letter names, distinguish between lower and uppercase letters, letter-sound and sound-letter practice including be able to visualise letters when the name of the letter is said aloud. A set of plastic letters (both upper and lowercase can be helpful here). A set of rainbow alphabet charts can be downloaded free - see signup form at the end of the blog - for assessing current knowledge, working on gaps and improving writing as well as reading). Strong phonics programmes and phonics interventions - including opportunities to repeatedly hear phonics modelling is beneficial (try recording video/audio that pupils can repeatedly listen to whilst looking at the associated visual cues - some pupils need far more repetition of the modelling + many more opportunities to say the sounds aloud than is possible in class phonic sessions. These can also then be accessed at home. New technologies allow personalised learning that enable the child to repeatedly listen (or record themselves) without necessarily always needing an adult to be physically with the child.
From Year 2 upwards:
Several researchers have found that repeating the same passage of text aloud until a level of fluency is achieved improves rates of reading and that improvements transfer to new pieces of text (Dowhower, 1986; Herman 1985; Taylor et al 1985; Screiber 1980). The pieces of text that are used in the intervention need to become more sophisticated over time for progress to be made. Dowhower found that repeated readings improved reading rate, accuracy, comprehension and prosody (expression, pausing appropriately, responding to punctuation, correct emphasis).
A related technique is repeated 'listening-while-reading' texts. The pupil reads the text whilst listening to an adult modelling a fluent rendition (preferably more than once). Several studies have found this to be effective in supporting struggling readers. An advantage of the 'listening-while-reading' is that is can be completed by the teacher or via a recording of the passage being read, enabling more pupils to be part of an 1:1 intervention group as it is 1 pupil : 1 set of headphones and a wider range of passages can be recorded, again, enabling more pupils to be targeted. (If you would like to know more on this subject, read the article Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency by Timothy E Rasinski, Journal of Educational Research 1990).
Pupils can also benefit from repeated readings with teacher feedback - the sentence (or short section of text) is read by the pupil, the teacher provides feedback, the pupil immediately re-reads. The pupil reads the next sentence/ section and repeats the process. It is probably preferable to read the whole piece as one fluid text at the end of the session.
Timed practice (how many words are read in a set period of time - which is tracked) has been shown to positively impacted on reading rates. It does sound like a harsher process, but it has been proven to have positive results. Perhaps because it brings reading speed into the forefront of the pupil's mind and provides an opportunity to practice.
(You can download a PDF version of this by completing the form at the end of the blog).
Text choice for the interventions above: Where possible, texts selected for interventions should be interesting and motivating to read. It would be useful if the texts linked together, e.g. texts in the same topic or stories that are sequenced. This will help to make interventions into authentic reading opportunities. If texts selected relate to the curriculum, the intervention might kill two birds with one stone - particularly if at the end of the reading intervention the adult and child discuss the text and what they have learned from reading it. Interventions would therefore ideally include texts that are both fiction and non-fiction. The level of challenge should move on with the child's development, so as to always offer opportunities for progression.
Implications for wider practice. In whole class reading sessions pupils need to: see the text, read the text and engage with the text. Teachers should take all steps possible for this to happen when running whole class reading lessons. It is not enough for the teacher to be the only one with a copy of the text when reading aloud to the class. Pupils need a copy of the text or at least one book between two pupils. Pupils must be able to engage with the text or whole class novel being read. They need opportunities to follow along as the teacher reads, to join in with echo reading, to read the text aloud, to engage in choral reading etc. It appears that the further one moves away from activities directly related to the reading process, the lower the correlation between the activity and reading achievement. An interesting point - some studies have shown that regular reading aloud by the teacher in class, e.g. 20 minutes every day, tends to encourage children to request that adults at home buy books / read to them, and tends to eventually increase independent reading. Good role models are needed!
It is interesting to consider what parents could take away from this. For example, the benefits of both the parent and the child having a copy of the text being read, particularly for older children. Recently, a friend of mine has been reading to her grandson remotely (due to self isolation). She has reported more success when they both had a copy of the text (since it is hard to share when physically remote from each other). The camera can focus on her, she can from time to time hold up the book and importantly the same is true for the child. They are both easily able to see the print and the pictures and therefore the experience is more enjoyable. The above table of interventions might also support parents in understanding why a child may be bringing home a text that they have already read in class, and promotes not only a child reading to an adult, but the importance of the adult reading to the child. The adult reading aloud to the child also allows the child the chance to access books that are beyond their current level of independent reading. Echo reading, where the adult models the sentence or section of text, is a strategy that many parents would be able to implement. Audio books for home use might also help pupils with listening-while-reading (as long as both the printed book and the audio book are provided). - We are not saying that 'sharing a book' doesn't have a place, it certainly does, but perhaps a little of both strategies would be advantageous for the development of reading skills.
"NIM (Neurological Impress Method), developed by Heckelman (1969), is a multisensory oral reading ﬂuency intervention for struggling readers that involves paired choral reading. NIM was designed for “impressing mature reading behaviors upon students” (Eldredge, 1988, p. 36). Initial studies were conducted in clinical settings with an adult and a struggling reader, sitting side by side, simultaneously reading aloud at a rapid rate using challenging texts. The voice of the adult was directed toward the student’s ear. The adult used a ﬁnger to track the spoken words. This method was designed to expose struggling readers to effective reading processes and to “break the phonics-bound condition that occurs in many children who have had intensive phonics training and still have not learned to read ﬂuently” (Heckelman, 1969, p. 281). According to Eldredge (1988), “repeated exposure to words frequently used in print probably improves the students’ sight recognition of such words, which, in turn, probably improves reading comprehension” (p. 41). Heckelman (1969) tested NIM with 24 adolescents, who achieved a mean increase of 1.9 grade levels after 7.5 hours of practice over 6 weeks. The range of increases in grade levels among participants was 0.8 to 5.9 grade levels, although the levels of text difﬁculty were not speciﬁed.' Eldredge and Butterﬁeld (1986) modiﬁed NIM for whole class reading practice by using student pairs—a strong reader paired with a weaker reader—who sit side by side while simultaneously reading aloud from the same book. Similar to the original NIM process, lead readers touch each word when read, running their ﬁngers smoothly under the words. The lead readers read at a normal speed as assisted readers repeat as many words as they can. Both readers look at each word as it is read. Calling the process “dyad reading,” Eldredge and Butterﬁeld found that the paired oral reading increased student achievement and improved struggling students’ attitudes toward reading. Dyad reading allowed students to effectively access and comprehend more challenging texts and increased the volume and diversity of texts read (Eldredge, 1988)." Extract from: The effects of dyad reading and text difﬁculty on third-graders’ reading achievement, Lisa Trottier Browna et al, Journal of Educational Research 2018. For this intervention to be successful, texts need to challenge the reader.You can see video clips on YouTube of NIM Neurological Impress Method. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGPxhCCOw_w
Dyad reading has been shown to positively impact on reading fluency and impacts on outcomes for both the lead reader and the supported reader. The classroom process can be set up with minimal training for the lead reader (or reading volunteer). It is important the text is sufficiently challenging - two to four years above the struggling readers independent reading level. Starting at the lower end of this spectrum and increasing the challenge of text incrementally ensures pupils are challenged without being overwhelmed. Assessing every 4-6 weeks can help to ensure text challenge is increased as soon as possible. Studies have shown struggling readers who were 1 to 2 years behind their peers were able to catch up to their age related expected level across a year when reading Dyads were used for 15 minutes every day across a year with challenging texts. The process helps struggling readers to focuses on phrases and sentences, rather than over emphasising individual word reading. The procedure allows the struggling reader to focus on the messages in the text, making reading a meaningful process.
Make sure you check phonics: For pupils who are really struggling with reading rate and accuracy (below 90% accuracy) and spelling, the teacher would need to assess phonics. These pupils may still be in the early developmental stages of reading in which they have relatively few words recognised as sight words, low lexical quality for many word representations, and relatively undeveloped strategies for decoding unfamiliar words (Ehri, 2005; Perfetti, 2007; Sharp et al., 2008). Research suggests that until underlying foundational skills such as phonemic awareness, letter-sound knowledge, and concept of word are well-established, attempts to increase sight word vocabulary and, as a result, word read per minute, will not succeed (Bursuck & Damer, 2007; Flanigan, 2007; Morris, Bloodgood, Lomax, & Perney, 2003). As with all interventions, it is important to match the right intervention to the right child and to regularly assess the impact of the intervention to see if any amendments to the programme need to be made.
Year 6 writers: It is worth checking the fluency (particularly prosody) of middle attaining writers and those just below the expected standard in writing in Year 6. Interventions that focus on fluency can often help a pupil see the 'hooks' that writers use and appreciate the author's technique. If pupils read quite robotically, not only will it impact on reading speed, but also comprehension and writing style. If one of the interventions previously described was combined with discussion after the reading about author technique, it would be both a reading and a writing intervention. Carefully selected pieces of text could be read for fluency and then discussed with 'evaluation' in mind, e.g. different sentence openers, the mix of longer and shorter sentences, vivid verbs and precise nouns, use of carefully selected adjectives, use of punctuation, interspersing dialogue, how to make dialogue authentic, dialogue tags - one focus per session with repeated opportunities to see the same technique before moving on to a new focus. This type of intervention can be further strengthened by supplementary writing tasks and grammar activities that require the pupil to mimic the author technique between intervention sessions.
Silent reading speed: It is also interesting to consider if you have any pupils in your class that have a silent reading rate that is the same or lower than their oral reading rate. Normally, silent reading rates are substantially higher (as outlined earlier), but some pupils struggle to make the transition. For children in year groups 4,5,6 it would be worth noting if any pupils fall into this profile. It can be easily missed. It can be identified in a number of ways. Ad-hoc: as your class are set a silent reading task, circulate around the class and watch the speed at which the text is being read. You can usually spot those who are reading slowly and seem to be behind the majority of the class. You might also be able to spot the reason for this, e.g. difficulty with stamina, wandering attention, pausing too often - perhaps because of difficulties with vocabulary, anxiety at being asked to read in silence under a time pressure. It is important to try and identify the underlying cause, and address this factor, e.g. interventions that focus on 'fix-it' strategies to use when reading unfamiliar words, interventions that focus on maintaining concentration and recognising when 'drift' is occurring, interventions that specifically focus on word reading rates - or combinations of these. Pupils can also be assessed in a more systematic way, e.g. being asked to read at their normal rate for one minute (silently) and assessing the last word read when the time is up. In some silent reading tests, the child is given a series of words without any spaces between them (e.g., dimhowfigblue) and asked to use slash lines to mark word boundaries (e.g., dim/how/fig/blue). Interventions to address issues identified in this type of assessment usually focus on computer programmes where the text appears/disappears at a set rate (which increases over time) to push silent readers to read more quickly (such as the RAP rapid-accelerated-reading computer program). Encouraging silent reading skills can also be achieved through a particular type of practice, e.g. pupils read an unfamiliar paragraph or short section of text silently, they then close the book and then answer questions on the text.
The interventions which are effective often include aspects of reading aloud, repetition, modelling and feedback. This would therefore suggest that performance poetry and performance scripted plays might also help with accuracy and fluency - although I have not specifically sought out any research to confirm whether or not this is the case.
One interesting set of survey results (Year 2 pupils) was produced by Christine Grima-Farrell, (Nasen 2015) showing pupil views of an intervention which included repeated reading. Whilst I have not seen other studies that have asked pupils if they enjoyed repeated reading, this survey would suggest that there is a motivation and enjoyment factor in seeing the improvements in fluency and accuracy achieved through repeated reading. I think the middle question 'Were you able to do your best reading?' is a particularly interesting question. For struggling readers, having an opportunity to perform at your best must be a real confidence boost. How many times in a year might struggling readers be proud of their accomplishments or recognise the progress they have made? Again, perhaps another endorsement for performance poetry where pupils could be given intervention time and support to help prepare them for sharing a poetry piece. If introducing repeated reading interventions in your school, a survey or interviews of participants should be part of the review process. I wonder if any intervention groups are asked about the selection of the texts - are they sufficiently challenging? Are they enjoyable? Do they feel they have gained knowledge from reading the texts? There is evidence that texts need to be challenging to be motivational!
As fluency and automaticity improve, reading comprehension improves, including having more working memory avilable to focus on higher order thinking. The volume of reading positively impacts on both fluency and reading comprehension as well as wide range of other measures. For many pupils, a lack of fluency is getting in the way of making progress in comprehension.
Evidence for quantity of reading (particularly reading for pleasure):
Regularly reading stories or novels outside of school is associated with higher scores in reading assessments (PIRLS, 2006; PISA, 2009).
Clark (2011) in a large scale survey of over 18,000 young people found that those who reported enjoying reading very much were six times more likely than those who did not enjoy reading to read above the expected level for their age. Young people who reported not enjoying reading at all were 11 times more likely than those who enjoyed reading very much to read below the level expected for their age.
Evidence from OECD (2002) found that reading enjoyment is more important for children’s educational success than their family’s socio-economic status.
Anderson, Wilson, and Fielding (1988) traced reading growth to independent reading and reading volume. They found that the amount of time students spent in independent reading outside of school was the best predictor of reading achievement.
Longitudinal data from the British Cohort Study found that recreational reading was more strongly linked to cognitive skills of adolescents than parental education (Sullivan & Brown, 2015).
Growth in syntactic understanding. There is evidence that reading stories helps children to grow their understanding of more complex sentences (Chomsky 1972). There are also studies that parents reading aloud stories to young children increased the length of utterances of young children aged 21-35 months (Whitehurst et al, 1988).
Struggling readers are often asked to read less. In addition, they are likely to read more slowly and therefore do not read the same quantity of text as more advanced readers. Teachers should consider how the gap in reading quantity can be diminished, e.g. increasing the frequency of reading, interventions aimed at speeding up the rate of reading, seeking ways of pupils engaging with texts across subjects, reading at home, listening-while reading interventions & home listening.
Studies have identified several factors of home reading that influence a child's progress. Beers (1998) identified that parents of avid readers: read aloud to their children until the age of 7/8 (although I would recommend well beyond this - choose great books that both the adult and child will enjoy); read at different times in the day, including bedtime; read aloud at least 4 times a week, if not daily; and read for 30 minutes of longer. Parents have books in the house and show that they value books and reading. Older siblings might also play a positive role in encouraging reading, e.g. reading aloud to younger children, shared reading experiences, recommending books, showing their own enjoyment of reading, talking about books
Is there a downside to reading quickly? What would children say are the pros and cons of reading quickly / slowly? Do pupils use their speed of reading as a yardstick? What might be the dangers of this?
So, on the one hand we want to improve the rate of reading, fluency and accuracy because this will help reading to be more automatic and allow pupils to focus on reading comprehension. It is also likely to increase enjoyment of reading, and therefore increase pupil motivation to read. This in turn is likely to lead to more extensive reading, and we know that the quantity of reading helps with reading comprehension, reading fluency and many other aspects of reading. We create a positive upwards cycle! One of the reasons why early reading is so important to get right! A positive start is more likely to lead to a positive end result.
However, we also want our pupils to know that it is not a speed test. The rate of reading helps for many reasons, but they also need to know when to slow down!
Good readers are able to alter their rate of reading. They choose to slow down at specific points, e.g. when they notice that comprehension has broken down; when reading a text that is complex, challenging, has an unfamiliar context; when the goal of the reading demands it - e.g. needing to answer in-depth questions about the text that has been read, revising for a test, needing to follow a set of instructions to make something. Poor readers often read at exactly the same rate no matter what the circumstances and often do not notice when comprehension is not being achieved.
We need to ask: Are children aware, when given a complex text that they are experiencing difficulties (self-monitoring comprehension)? Do children know when to spend longer on the text (self-regulating)? Do they know how to change their own behaviour as agents of their own knowledge acquisition (self-efficacy)?
For example, in a study of 5-10 years olds, pupils were asked to read a text in preparation for a test. More competent readers spent 27 seconds on easy paragraphs and 46 seconds on more difficult ones. Less effective readers did not show these same metacognitive processes and spent the same amount of time on easy and difficult paragraphs. Teachers need to consider how metacognition creates more effective readers. One way to do this is to talk about 'what good readers do', to use 'think alouds' to reveal the teacher's thinking as they read and to model the changes in speeds of reading. More metacognitive readers also employ more 'debugging strategies' when they are stuck. We can build up pupils' knowledge of fix-it strategies.
(Fix it strategies such as: re-read; look up unknown words in a dictionary; look for context clues; circle words and check later; read to the end and go back to the unknown word or section; ask a question; try to visualise description; slow down; underline key points; focus on the elements that you do know and raise questions about the aspects you are unsure of; clear the mind and consider deep breathing to reset focus; read an easier book / build background knowledge on the topic and then come back to the more challenging text; read with a partner; engage in active thinking; ask questions in your mind as your read; stop, pause & reflect on what has been read and the understanding achieved.)
As experienced readers read, they begin to generate a mental representation, or gist, of the text. This then serves as a mental framework for understanding the text as a whole and subsequent parts of a text. As they read further, they can test if their thinking makes sense within this construct and monitor their understanding, paying attention to any inconsistencies that arise as they read. They draw on a variety of strategies to adjust their understandings. They approach texts with purpose and use the goal to guide their reading, taking a stance towards the text and responding to the ideas that take shape in the written conversations between the author and themselves.
Teachers can help pupils with all of these aspects:
- reading for understanding;
- teaching pupils how to appreciate different goals for reading;
- building knowledge of different genres;
- recommending regular pause and reflect moments;
- encouraging pupils to continually evaluate what they understand;
-check consistency with their predictions, and for appropriateness of what they already know about a topic - does it make sense, is it plausible, does it fit?
- teaching pupils how to summarise text, retrieve important information, take notes, use graphic organisers;
- reading texts more than once - once for gist, twice for depth and detail;
- modelling own processes and thinking aloud to show pupils how monitoring for meaning can be achieved;
- discussing what is known/unknown; what is certain/uncertain - talking about the parts of the text they find tricky and which they find easier;
- identifying paragraphs to return to (perhaps numbering paragraphs so they can be referred to in discussions);
- encouraging pupils to ask questions;
- ensuring that tasks set after the reading require understanding or help to build understanding, e.g. discussion questions; higher-order thinking questions; inference questions;
-having high expectations and a positive classroom ethos;
-modelling fix-it strategies;
- completing collaborative tasks;
- choosing challenging texts that require pupils to think, study and problem solve.
When the above list are a focus of teaching and learning, pupils are going to learn how to modify their reading behaviours, including the length of time spent on a text or sections of a text; the process of re-reading sections; the strategy of slowing down when necessary; the level of concentration to apply.
Metacognitive reading strategies identified in Brown's work in 1980 and Baker and Brown's work in 1984 identified the following:
Classifying the purposes of reading - that is, understanding the explicit and the implicit task demands;
Identifying the important aspects of a message;